May 10, 2018 1 min read

Fuel Economy Standards: There is No Tradeoff with Safety, Cost and Fleet Turnover

R

CFA has undertaken an analysis of the relationship between increased vehicle fuel efficiency and safety, vehicle cost, fleet turnover, and sales, given these issues are part of the Trump/Pruitt team’s stated rationale for freezing gradually increasing fuel efficiency requirements intended to carry through to 2025, at year 2020. The original requirement was a true consensus standard in which the car companies, consumers, environmentalists, unions, and the government came to agreement in 2011 with implementation starting in 2012.

In what amounts to a rollback of the well-considered, money-saving standards, the Trump/Pruitt team has said that they jeopardize safety, hamper sales and raise costs. However, this report finds that newer, more fuel efficient vehicles have: 1) more safety features, 2) continue a strong upward trend in sales, 3) provide cost savings that eliminate price increases, and, in fact, 4) sell better as their fuel efficiency increases.

Download PDF

Related Articles

R
December 04, 2025 / Press Releases
Karim D. Marshall Joins CFA as New Director of Climate and Energy Policy
R
July 24, 2025 / Press Releases
California Drivers Spend an Extra $180 on Gas Due to Inefficient Replacement Tires
R
July 18, 2025 / Testimony & Comments
CFA Calls on the Department of Energy to Uphold Energy and Water Conservation Standards
R
June 17, 2025 / Testimony & Comments
CFA and Energy Advocacy Groups Submit Comments on Energy Conservation Standards for Consumer Furnace Fans