In Amicus Brief, Consumer Federation of America Urges Court to Prohibit Use of Marital Status in Auto Insurance Pricing
In an amicus brief filed with the Court of Appeal for California's First Appellate District, the Consumer Federation of America urged the Court to prohibit insurance companies' use of marital status in auto insurance pricing and underwriting, since it results in unfair penalties for certain drivers.
Auto insurance companies currently charge single, divorced, and widowed drivers higher premiums for insurance coverage, and the California Department of Insurance is refusing to ban this practice. In April 2025, CFA conducted tests of five large auto insurers to determine if pricing differed among drivers with different marital statuses, even when all other characteristics – including driving history – were held constant. Our analysis found that four out of five insurers impose a surcharge for being unmarried.
Moreover, insurers' use of this factor results in unfair discrimination against certain classes of consumers, including a disparate impact on Black and Latino consumers.
Our Subject Matter Experts
Related Articles
Consumer Federation of America Calls on Maryland Legislators to Continue and Strengthen Auto Insurance Workgroup
Consumer Federation of America Urges Maryland Committee to Reform Auto Insurance Workgroup, Include Voices of Consumer Advocates
Consumer Advocates Call on Massachusetts Committee to Support Bill to Lower Auto Insurance Costs