January 20, 2016 1 min read

H.R. 4293 and H.R. 4294 Are Even Weaker Than the Current Standards That Fail to Protect Retirement Savers

CFA TC

Late last year, Representatives Phil Roe, Peter Roskam, Richard Neal and John Larson introduced legislation they describe as an “alternative” to the Department of Labor’s (DoL) conflict of interest rulemaking. In fact, however, their legislation would be a big step backward. Far from being a pro-retirement security alternative to DoL action, the legislation would weaken the already inadequate protections afforded by current outdated regulations.

Related Articles

CFA TC
November 20, 2025 / Press Releases
CFA Requests SEC Correspondence with Harvard Law Professor Hal Scott Regarding Mandatory Arbitration
CFA TC
July 15, 2025 / Press Releases
CFA Statement on Firing of PCAOB Chair Erica Williams
CFA TC
April 29, 2025 / Fact Sheets
Reconciliation Proposal to Eliminate the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Will Expose Investors to Hundreds of Billions in Losses
CFA TC
February 26, 2025 / Press Releases
Coalition of Consumer and Investor Protection Groups Strongly Oppose Billionaires’ Bill in Delaware