Consumer Groups Call on US Trade Representative to Maintain Stance on Investor-State Dispute Settlement in NAFTA Re-Negotiations
In a letter to US Trade Representative Robert E. Lighthizer regarding ongoing NAFTA re-negotiations, Consumers Union, US PIRG, and CFA are calling on Lighthizer to maintain his stanceĀ on behalf of American sovereignty and American consumers by making Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) optional, and confining its use, even for a country who opts for it, to true instances of actual, physical government seizure and expropriation of property. There are reports of increasing pressures reportedly being exerted upon Lighthizer, by elements of the international business elite, to abandon or soften efforts to confine the availability of ISDS. While we seriously question the need for retaining ISDS in any form, Lighthizer's proposal, as it has been reported, would go a long way toward eliminating the potential for ISDS to be abused.
Download PDF
Our Subject Matter Experts
Related Articles
Mayor-Elect Mamdani Appoints Consumer Protection Champion Sam Levine as Commissioner of New York City Department of Consumer and Worker Protection
Trump’s CFPB Waves the White Flag on the Military Lending Act to Give MoneyLion a Sweetheart Deal. Why?