December 02, 2010 2 min read

CFA's Susan Grant testifies before House Energy and Commerce subcommittee on Do-Not-Track Legislation

CFA TC

On behalf of Consumer Federation of America, an association of nearly 300 nonprofit consumer organizations in the United States that was established in 1968 to advance the consumer interest through research, advocacy, and education, I am pleased to submit testimony on this important question: is now the right time for “do‐not‐track” legislation. The answer, simply put, is Yes.

As a recent Wall Street Journal investigative series so clearly detailed, consumers are being tracked on the Internet wherever they go, whatever they do, without their knowledge and consent. Information about their online activities – what they search for, what they click on, what they purchase, what they share with others – is compiled, analyzed, and used to profile them. Sometimes information that is gathered about them offline is added to create even richer profiles. This “behavioral tracking” is primarily used for marketing purposes at this point, but it can also be used to make assumptions about people in connection with employment, housing, insurance, and financial services; for purposes of lawsuits against individuals; and for government surveillance. There are no limits to what types of information can be collected, how long it can be retained, with whom it can be shared, or how it can be used. As the Wall Street Journal characterized it in the beginning of its series, “one of the fastest‐  growing businesses on the Internet is the business of spying on consumers.”

Related Articles

CFA TC
April 21, 2026 / Press Releases
Consumer Federation of America Sues Meta for Failing to Protect Users from Scam Advertisements
CFA TC
March 11, 2026 / Press Releases
Americans Estimated to Lose $119 Billion Annually to Online Scams
CFA TC
March 11, 2026 / Reports
The Scam Economy: The True Cost of Online Scams and Crimes in America

A Consumer Federation of America Report

CFA TC
March 03, 2026 / Testimony & Comments
Testimony of the Consumer Federation of America in Support of Maryland Surveillance Pricing Legislation: HB895/SB387