November 05, 2019 1 min read

CFA and Other Groups Argue that Intent is Not Required Under State UDAP Statutes

CFA TC

In an amicus brief filed with a Pennsylvania Court, CFA and other groups said that when consumers are harmed by unfair and deceptive acts or practices by businesses, they are not required to prove intent to deceive in order to obtain relief under state unfair and deceptive acts or practices statutes.

Related Articles

CFA TC
February 24, 2026 / Press Releases
CFA’s State of the Economy 2026
CFA TC
December 22, 2025 / Press Releases
Mayor-Elect Mamdani Appoints Consumer Protection Champion Sam Levine as Commissioner of New York City Department of Consumer and Worker Protection
CFA TC
December 12, 2025 / Blogs
Trump’s CFPB Waves the White Flag on the Military Lending Act to Give MoneyLion a Sweetheart Deal. Why?
CFA TC
December 01, 2025 / Testimony & Comments
CFA and AELP Submit Petition to FTC for Renewed Click to Cancel Rulemaking