March 26, 2020 2 min read

Groups Condemn ‘Emergency’ Regulatory Guidance that Allows Banks to Make Predatory Payday Loans

PR

Washington, D.C. – Today, under the cover of a national crisis, five federal bank regulators issued small dollar bank lending guidance that lacks the consumer protections needed to ensure loans do not trap borrowers in a cycle of debt. The guidance was issued by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), Federal Reserve Board (FRB), National Credit Union Administration (NCUA), Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). The guidance does not warn against unaffordable, high interest rates and says that balloon payments may be appropriate – paving the way for loans with characteristics of debt trap payday loans. Several civil rights and consumer groups forcefully condemned this action.

The groups issued the following statement:

“This is the worst possible time for banks to make predatory payday loans. Government regulators have opened the door for banks to exploit people, rather than to help them.

“Essential consumer protection measures are absent from this guidance. By saying nothing about the harm of high-interest loans, regulators are allowing banks to charge exorbitant prices when people in need can least afford it. They have also lent credibility to single balloon-payment structured loans, which have been shown to trap people in a cycle of repeat reborrowing and crushing debt.

“Banks should not take the bait of this terrible idea. Especially at a time when banks are receiving 0% interest loans from the federal government, bank loans should be fair and affordable – at annual rates no higher than 36% for small loans and lower for larger loans. We will be monitoring whether banks offer loans that help or loans that hurt.

Around the time of the last recession, a handful of banks issued ‘deposit advances’ that put borrowers in an average of 19 loans a year at over 200% annual interest. These bank payday loans disproportionately harmed the financially vulnerable and badly damaged banks’ reputations. Since 2013 when regulatory guidance warned against this form of credit, banks have mostly stayed away. We trust that they will continue to do so as they do not want to repeat mistakes of the past.”

Related Articles

PR
March 05, 2026 / Testimony & Comments
CFA’s Adam Rust Testifies Before House Financial Services Committee on Escalating Threat of Fraud and Scams
PR
March 04, 2026 / Press Releases
CFA’s Adam Rust Testifies Before House Financial Services Committee on Escalating Threat of Fraud and Scams
PR
February 26, 2026 / Testimony & Comments
CFA Joins Letter Expressing Concerns Over Discussion Draft of Earned Wage Access Consumer Protection Act
PR
February 23, 2026 / Press Releases
CFA Statement Supporting NTEU in Court of Appeals Hearing in National Treasury Employees Union v. Vought