October 10, 2019 1 min read

Why The Case Of “The Irregulators V. The FCC” Is So Important To Consumers

B

In a major analysis published almost three years ago, CFA showed that consumers are being overcharged over $70 billion a year for their broadband, wireless and television services. Today the Irregulators filled their reply brief in the legal challenges to the FCC’s decision to continue its fraudulent accounting rules that allocate two-thirds of the costs of the communications network to the intrastate local service jurisdiction, even though today two-thirds of communications revenue is collected in the interstate jurisdiction.

The FCC'S Fraudulent Accounting Rules Explained

Related Articles

B
February 24, 2026 / Press Releases
CFA’s State of the Economy 2026
B
December 22, 2025 / Press Releases
Mayor-Elect Mamdani Appoints Consumer Protection Champion Sam Levine as Commissioner of New York City Department of Consumer and Worker Protection
B
December 12, 2025 / Blogs
Trump’s CFPB Waves the White Flag on the Military Lending Act to Give MoneyLion a Sweetheart Deal. Why?
B
December 01, 2025 / Testimony & Comments
CFA and AELP Submit Petition to FTC for Renewed Click to Cancel Rulemaking